Have you ever been halfway through training a deep learning model, watching the validation loss drop nicely, only to be stopped dead by a ‘CUDA out of memory’ error? I have. More times than I’d like to admit. It’s a common wall we hit when ambition meets hardware limits. We want to train bigger models on more data, but our GPUs have other ideas. This isn’t just about buying a bigger card. It’s about working smarter with what you have.
This exact frustration is why I spent time learning two powerful methods: gradient accumulation and mixed precision training. Together, they let you push past memory barriers and often speed up training. Think of it as getting a free hardware upgrade through better code. Let me show you how they work.
First, let’s understand the problem. Your GPU memory holds several things during training. It stores the model’s weights. It keeps the gradients, which are directions for updating those weights. It holds the optimizer’s state, like momentum in Adam. Crucially, it also stores the activations from each layer during the forward pass. This last part is the memory hog, and it grows directly with your batch size.
So, why not just use a tiny batch? You could, but small batches can make training unstable. The gradient estimates are noisy. Large batches provide a smoother, more accurate signal for each update. This is where gradient accumulation offers a clever workaround. What if you could get the benefit of a large batch without needing the memory for it all at once?
The idea is simple. You break a large batch into smaller pieces, called micro-batches. You run a forward pass and backward pass on a micro-batch, calculate the gradients, but you don’t update the model weights yet. Instead, you let those gradients add up, or accumulate, in memory. After processing several micro-batches, you finally update the weights using the average of all the accumulated gradients. You then clear the gradients and start again.
Here is a standard training loop for comparison.
# Standard training loop
optimizer.zero_grad()
outputs = model(inputs)
loss = criterion(outputs, targets)
loss.backward()
optimizer.step() # Update weights immediatelyNow, here’s the same loop with gradient accumulation.
accumulation_steps = 4
optimizer.zero_grad()
for micro_batch_idx in range(accumulation_steps):
# Get a micro_batch of data
micro_inputs, micro_targets = get_micro_batch()
outputs = model(micro_inputs)
loss = criterion(outputs, micro_targets)
# Normalize the loss so the final gradient average is correct
loss = loss / accumulation_steps
loss.backward() # Gradients accumulate
# After accumulating over 4 micro-batches, update the weights once
optimizer.step()
optimizer.zero_grad()In this example, we effectively train with a batch size four times larger, but we only need memory for one micro-batch at a time. The gradients for the smaller steps are summed together. The key is scaling the loss down by the number of steps so the final update is the correct average. Isn’t it interesting how a simple change in the order of operations can solve such a big problem?
This technique saves memory on activations. But what about making everything faster and using even less memory? That’s where mixed precision training comes in.
Modern GPUs have special cores called Tensor Cores. They are designed to perform math very quickly on a specific format: 16-bit floating point numbers, or FP16. The problem is, FP16 has a limited range. Numbers can get too big (overflow) or too small (underflow), which can ruin your training.
Mixed precision training is like a best-of-both-worlds solution. We use FP16 where it’s fast and safe, and FP32 (standard 32-bit) where we need precision. We store weights, activations, and gradients in FP16 to speed up math and cut memory use in half. However, we keep a master copy of the weights in FP32. All weight updates happen in this more precise FP32 space, and then are cast back down to FP16 for the next forward pass. This prevents the small updates from getting lost in the limited FP16 format.
Managing this manually is complex. Thankfully, PyTorch provides a tool called Automatic Mixed Precision (AMP). It handles the casting between types automatically.
from torch.cuda.amp import autocast, GradScaler
scaler = GradScaler() # Handles gradient scaling to prevent underflow
optimizer.zero_grad()
with autocast(): # Context manager for automatic FP16 casting
outputs = model(inputs) # Runs in FP16
loss = criterion(outputs, targets)
# Scales the loss to prevent underflow, then backward pass
scaler.scale(loss).backward()
# Unscales gradients, then optimizer step
scaler.step(optimizer)
scaler.update() # Adjusts the scale factor for next iteration
optimizer.zero_grad()The GradScaler is a critical safety feature. It multiplies the loss by a factor before the backward pass, lifting the gradients into a range where FP16 can represent them. After the backward pass, it unscales the gradients before the optimizer uses them. It also dynamically adjusts this scale factor to avoid overflow.
Now, what happens when we combine these two superpowers? We get memory efficiency from both. Gradient accumulation reduces activation memory. Mixed precision cuts the storage for all tensors in half. The combination is very common in training large models.
Here is how you would write a training step that uses both.
accumulation_steps = 4
scaler = GradScaler()
optimizer.zero_grad()
for step in range(accumulation_steps):
micro_inputs, micro_targets = get_micro_batch()
with autocast():
outputs = model(micro_inputs)
loss = criterion(outputs, micro_targets)
loss = loss / accumulation_steps # Normalize for accumulation
# Accumulate scaled gradients
scaler.scale(loss).backward()
# Update weights once per effective large batch
scaler.step(optimizer)
scaler.update()
optimizer.zero_grad()You might be wondering, do these methods change how the model learns? With gradient accumulation, the result is mathematically equivalent to using the larger effective batch size, provided you scale the loss correctly. Mixed precision, with a scaler, is designed to be numerically stable. The final model quality should match full-precision training, just much faster and with less memory.
Are there any catches? A few. Gradient accumulation makes each weight update slower, as you are doing multiple forward/backward passes before stepping. The benefit is memory, not speed. Mixed precision can sometimes lead to instability if the loss scaling fails. Monitoring for ‘inf’ or ‘nan’ values in your loss is a good practice when you first enable it.
I encourage you to start by adding gradient accumulation to your current project if you’re hitting memory limits. Then, try adding AMP. The speedup can feel like magic. Remember, the goal is to train better models, not just faster ones. These tools help you do both.
What memory-saving trick will you try first on your next project? If you found this guide helpful, please share it with a colleague who’s also battling memory errors. Have you used these techniques before? What was your experience? Let me know in the comments
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva
