You might have noticed something curious in our field. We spend months, maybe years, learning to build neural networks. We master convolutions, attention layers, and backpropagation. Yet, the very first step—deciding what network to build—often remains a guessing game. We copy designs from papers, stack layers by intuition, and hope for the best. What if we could teach the machine to design itself?
This question is what led me into the world of Neural Architecture Search, or NAS. The idea is simple but powerful. Instead of us manually sketching every architectural detail, we define a set of rules and possible components. Then, we let an algorithm explore this design space to find the best model for our specific problem. It’s like having an AI apprentice that learns the art of model building.
Consider a standard model you might write. You define the layers one by one.
model = nn.Sequential(
nn.Conv2d(3, 32, kernel_size=3, padding=1),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.MaxPool2d(2),
nn.Conv2d(32, 64, kernel_size=3, padding=1),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.MaxPool2d(2),
nn.Flatten(),
nn.Linear(64 * 8 * 8, 128),
nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(128, 10)
)This process relies entirely on our experience and what we’ve seen work before. But what about the designs we haven’t thought of? How do we know this arrangement is optimal? This is where NAS steps in. We stop asking “What should the model be?” and start asking “How can we find the best model?”
Why now? Because the tools are ready. We have powerful frameworks like PyTorch, significant computational resources, and a mature understanding of search algorithms. It’s no longer just a research topic for large tech companies. Individual developers and smaller teams can build their own search systems. You can tailor the search to your unique needs—maybe you need a tiny model for a mobile phone, or a highly accurate one for medical imaging.
So, how does it actually work? One effective method uses concepts from evolution. Think of each potential network design as an individual in a population. Each design has a “genome” that describes its structure. We start with a random group of these designs. Then, we test them. The best performers get to “reproduce.” Their genes are mixed and slightly altered to create new, hopefully better, designs for the next generation.
Let’s build the core of this system. First, we need a way to describe a network so a computer can manipulate it. We’ll create a simple ArchitectureGenome class.
import torch.nn as nn
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
@dataclass
class LayerGene:
"""A gene representing a single layer's blueprint."""
layer_type: str # e.g., 'conv', 'pool'
channels: int
kernel: int
activation: str
class ArchitectureGenome:
"""Holds the full blueprint for one network."""
def __init__(self, layer_genes: List[LayerGene]):
self.genes = layer_genes
self.fitness = 0.0 # This will hold its accuracy score
def build_model(self, input_channels: int) -> nn.Module:
"""Turns the genome into a real PyTorch model."""
layers = []
in_channels = input_channels
for gene in self.genes:
if gene.layer_type == 'conv':
layers.append(
nn.Conv2d(in_channels, gene.channels, gene.kernel, padding=1)
)
in_channels = gene.channels
elif gene.layer_type == 'pool':
layers.append(nn.MaxPool2d(2))
# Add the activation function
if gene.activation == 'relu':
layers.append(nn.ReLU())
# ... more activations can be added
layers.append(nn.Flatten())
# We'd need logic for the final classifier head here
return nn.Sequential(*layers)This is a basic blueprint. A real genome would include more details like skip connections or batch normalization. The key is that this list of genes is our searchable object. But a list of random layers won’t form a working network. How do we ensure the designs are valid? We define a search space.
A search space is the set of all allowed decisions. It’s the rulebook. It says you can have between 3 and 20 layers. Each layer can be a 3x3 convolution, a 5x5 convolution, or a pooling layer. The number of filters can be 16, 32, 64, or 128. This prevents the algorithm from wasting time on nonsense designs. It’s like giving the AI a box of Lego pieces and a picture of what a car looks like, then asking it to build the fastest one.
Now, we have a population of genomes. The next step is the most costly one: evaluation. How good is a given genome? To find out, we must turn it into a model, train it on our data, and check its accuracy. This is why NAS can be computationally expensive. Training thousands of models takes time.
But here’s a crucial insight: we don’t need to train each model to perfection. We can use a proxy. We might train for only 5 epochs instead of 100. Models that are fundamentally good will show promise early. This “low-fidelity” evaluation allows us to quickly sift through many candidates and only fully train the most promising ones. It’s like auditioning singers with a 30-second clip instead of a full concert.
Once we have scores, evolution begins. We select the top 20% of genomes as our “elite” parents. We create children by combining the genes of two parents—a process called crossover. Then, we apply random changes, or mutations, to some of the children. A mutation might change a layer type or the number of filters.
import random
def mutate_genome(genome: ArchitectureGenome, mutation_rate=0.1):
"""Randomly alter parts of the genome."""
new_genes = []
for gene in genome.genes:
if random.random() < mutation_rate:
# Example mutation: change the kernel size
if gene.layer_type == 'conv':
gene.kernel = random.choice([1, 3, 5])
new_genes.append(gene)
return ArchitectureGenome(new_genes)We repeat this cycle for many generations: evaluate, select, crossover, mutate. Over time, the population’s average fitness improves. We are not directly designing the network. We are designing the process that designs the network. This shift in perspective is what makes NAS so interesting.
You might wonder, is finding the single most accurate model the only goal? Often, it’s not. We also care about how big the model is, how fast it runs, or how much power it uses. This is where multi-objective search shines. We can adjust our fitness score to balance accuracy and efficiency. The fitness could become a combination like fitness = accuracy - 0.001 * number_of_parameters. This penalty steers the search toward simpler, leaner models that still perform well.
After running the search, we get a final population. The best genome is our discovered architecture. We take this blueprint and train it thoroughly from scratch. The result is a model born from data and search, not just human intuition.
The code snippets here are simplified for clarity. A full system would handle more complexity: variable input sizes, residual connections, and efficient training pipelines. But the core principle remains. You define the playground, and the algorithm finds the best player.
This journey from manual design to automated search represents a significant step in machine learning. It moves us from being pure architects to being curators of a creative process. We set the boundaries, and within them, the algorithm finds solutions we might never have considered.
Building your own NAS system teaches you more about network design than any textbook. You start to see which components truly matter and how they interact. You gain a feel for the search space itself. This knowledge makes you a better modeler, even when you design by hand.
I encourage you to take these concepts and try building a small search for a dataset you know well, like CIFAR-10. Start with a tiny search space. See what the process creates. You might be surprised by the elegance of the solutions it proposes.
If you found this walk-through helpful and are curious about the more advanced parts—like implementing efficient weight sharing or benchmarking against tools like AutoKeras—let me know in the comments. Sharing this article can help others start their own exploration into automated machine learning. What aspect of this automated design process intrigues you the most? Drop a comment below.
As a best-selling author, I invite you to explore my books on Amazon. Don’t forget to follow me on Medium and show your support. Thank you! Your support means the world!
101 Books
101 Books is an AI-driven publishing company co-founded by author Aarav Joshi. By leveraging advanced AI technology, we keep our publishing costs incredibly low—some books are priced as low as $4—making quality knowledge accessible to everyone.
Check out our book Golang Clean Code available on Amazon.
Stay tuned for updates and exciting news. When shopping for books, search for Aarav Joshi to find more of our titles. Use the provided link to enjoy special discounts!
📘 Checkout my latest ebook for free on my channel!
Be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe to the channel!
Our Creations
Be sure to check out our creations:
Investor Central | Investor Central Spanish | Investor Central German | Smart Living | Epochs & Echoes | Puzzling Mysteries | Hindutva | Elite Dev | JS Schools
We are on Medium
Tech Koala Insights | Epochs & Echoes World | Investor Central Medium | Puzzling Mysteries Medium | Science & Epochs Medium | Modern Hindutva
